Research
Anal Chem Ind J, Volume: 19( 1)

The Thermal Analysis of Felodipine and Ramipril: Application to Quality Control

*Correspondence:
Ali KA National Organization for Drug Control and Research (NODCAR), Giza, Egypt, E-Mail: [email protected]

Received: January 07, 2018; Accepted: January 16, 2018; Published: January 22, 2018

Citation: Ali KA, Elham AT, Zainab MY et al. The Thermal Analysis of Felodipine and Ramipril: Application to Quality Control. Anal Chem Ind J. 2019;19(1):146.

Abstract

Thermal behaviour of Felodipine (FEL) and Ramipril (RAM) drugs was studied in drug substance, binary mixture and co-formulated tablets. Some thermal analysis methods such as thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), derivative thermogravimetry (DrTGA), differential thermal analysis (DTA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were used to investigate the thermal behaviour of both drugs. The thermogravimetric data allowed the determination of different thermodynamic and kinetic parameters such as: Ea, ΔH, ΔS and ΔG. The drugs purity was found to be 99.88% and 99.92% for FEL and RAM, respectively. The simplicity, speed and low cost of the thermal analysis justify its application in the quality control of pharmaceutical drugs.

Keywords

Felodipine; Ramipril; Thermal analysis; Purity; Co-formulated; Thermodynamic parameters

Introduction

FEL (FIG. 1 ); ethylmethyl(4RS)-4-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-2,6-dimethyl-1,4dihydropyridine-3,dicarboxylate [1]. RMP (FIG. 1 ), (2S,3aS,6aS)-1-[(2S)-2[[(1S)-1-(Ethoxycarbonyl)-3 phenylpropyl] amino] propanoyl] octahydrocyclopenta[b] pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid [1]. Both drugs were used to treat high blood pressure.

analytical-chemistry-structure

FIG 1: The chemical structure of FEL and RAM.

FEL and RAM are co-formulated as oral tablet which is used in several antihypertension preparations. The antihypertensive efficacy of the combination was additive and the coadministration of ramipril did not decrease the incidence of headache attributable to felodipine [2].

Several methods were reported for the determination of FEL individually using UV spectrophotometry [3], HPLC [4-6], spectrofluorimetric [7], gas chromatography [8], and electrochemical methods [9,10]. On the other hand, RMP was determined individually by spectrophotometric methods [11-13], HPLC [12,14,15], HPTLC [16,17] and electrochemical methods [18-21]. Meanwhile, some spectrophotometric [22,23], HPLC [22-25] and HPTLC [26] methods were reported for the simultaneous determination of both drugs.

Thermal analysis is the measurement of physical-chemical properties of materials using function of temperature. The most widely used thermal analysis techniques are, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), derivative thermogravimetric analysis (DrTGA), differential thermal analysis (DTA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) find wide spread use for both quality control and research applications on industrial products, such as polymers and pharmaceuticals [27-29].

Thermal analysis has great importance in identification, stability, preformation, drug-excipient interaction and quality control of drugs [30]. DSC is used in the pharmaceutical industries, to determine the melting point, glass transition temperature, purity and thermal decomposition of drug substances, yielding results rapidly and efficiently.

Up to our knowledge, the present work is the first attempt to study the thermal behaviour of FEL and RAM in binary mixture and co-formulated tablet using green method to determine their purities.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Ramipril (RAM) was obtained from Kahira Pharmaceuticals and Chemical Industries Co. Felodipine (FEL) was kindly supplied from Egyptian Group for Pharmaceutical Industries. (EGPi Co., Egypt). The purity values of RAM (99.76%) and FEL (98.9%) were obtained using the official method [1]. Triacor® tablets, (Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH-Germany) was labeled to contain 5 mg RMP and 5 mg FEL purchased from local market.

Instruments and methods

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, DrTGA and DTA): Shimadzu thermogravimetric analyzer DTG-60 H with TA 60 software (Tokyo-Japan) was used; aluminium oxide is used as a reference. The experiments were achieved in platinum crucible up to 850°C at a heating rate of 5°C/min in dry nitrogen atmosphere (flow rate of 30 mL/min). About 5 mg of drug was used.

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC): Shimadzu-DSC 50 (Tokyo-Japan). The temperature ranged from 25°C to 400°C at a heating rate of 5°C/min in dry nitrogen atmosphere (flow rate of 30 mL/min). Round 5.0 mg of drug was packed in an aluminium pan. An empty aluminium pan was used as a reference.

Results and Discussion

Thermal analysis of FEL and RAM drug substances

FIG. 2A shows the TGA, DrTGA and DTA curves of FEL. The TGA and DrTGA curves show that FEL is thermally stable up to 190.62°C and decomposes at higher temperatures in one step. DTA curve was showed an exothermic peak at 56.09°C which may be due to glass transition, which means an increase in heat capacity due to transition of material from amorphous form into crystalline form. Endothermic peak at 143.61°C which may be due to melting and exothermic peaks appear during decomposition of the drug as follow: a highly weak and broad exothermic peak at 223.53°C, a strong exothermic peak at 310.69°C, a very weak and broad exothermic peak at 372.17°C, followed by a strong and broad exothermic peak at 473.06°C. The thermal decomposition mechanism of FEL was suggested as shown in FIG. 2B.

analytical-chemistry-decomposition

FIG 2: TGA, DrTGA and DTA curves of FEL (A) and suggested decomposition mechanism of FEL, (B) at heating rate of 5°C/min.

FIG. 3A shows the TGA, DrTGA and DTA curves of RAM. The TGA and DrTGA curves show that RAM is thermally stable up to 103.99°C and decomposes at higher temperatures in three steps. The first decomposition step happens in the temperature range of 103.99oC-137.59°C, RAM loses water molecule (Mass loss: Found 4.169%, Calc. 4.142%). The second decomposition step takes place in the temperature range of 137.59°C-350.37°C, RAM loses C21H27N2O4 (Mass loss: Found 85.338%, Calc. 85.386%). The third decomposition step occurs in the temperature range of 350.37°C-559.23°C, RAM loses C2H5O (Mass loss: Found 10.503%, Calc. 10.357%). The DTA curve shows an exothermic peak at 54.86°C which may be due to glass transition, an endothermic peak at 112.18°C which may be due to melting and the first decomposition step, an extremely weak and broad exothermic peaks at 215.98°C and 336.28°C which may be related to the second decomposition step. Medium and broad exothermic peak at 532.81°C due to the third decomposition step. The suggested thermal decomposition mechanism of RAM is shown in FIG. 3B.

analytical-chemistry-curves

FIG 3: TGA, DrTGA and DTA curves of RAM (A) and suggested decomposition mechanism of RAM, (B) at heating rate of 5°C/min.

Thermal analysis of FEL-RAM binary mixture

FIG. 4A displays the TGA and DrTGA of FEL-RAM mixture (1:1 w/w) which is the same proportion in Triacor® tablet. The mixture is thermally stable up to 96.72°C, and then the mixture starts to decompose in three decomposition steps. FIG. 4B exhibits the DTA curves of FEL-RAM mixture. The DTA curve of the mixture shows a broad exothermic peak at 65.64°C which may be attributed to glass transition of the drugs in the mixture. An endothermic peak at 104.62°C which may be related to the melting of RAM, a very weak exothermic peak at 316.45°C which may include the exothermic peaks at 310.69°C and 336.28°C in the DTA curves of FEL and RAM respectively. A very weak exothermic peak at 351.97°C which appears at 372.17oC and in the DTA curve of RAM, and a very weak and broad exothermic peak at 516.58°C which includes the two exothermic peaks appear at 473.06°C and 532.81°C in the DTA curves of FEL and RAM, respectively. The DTA curve of FEL-RAM mixture shows the disappearance of the endothermic peak at 143.61°C and an exothermic peak at 223.53°C in the DTA curve of FEL and the exothermic peak at 215.98°C in the DTA curve of RAM. The results show that there is no interaction between FEL and RAM.

analytical-chemistry-mixture

FIG 4: TGA and DrTGA curves of FL-RAM mixture (A) and DTA curves of FEL, RAM and FEL-RAM mixture, (B) at heating rate of 5°C/min.

Application of thermal analysis to Triacor® tablet

FIG. 5 displays the TGA and DTA of Triacor tablets (powder), the tablet powder starts to decompose at 45°C indicating that the tablet powder is less thermally stable than the pure drugs mixture which starts to decompose at to 97°C, this behavior may be attributed to excipients in tablets.

analytical-chemistry-analysis

FIG 5: Thermal analysis (TGA, DrTGA and DTA curves) of Triacor® tablet.

The DTA curve shows a broad exothermic peak at 45.97°C which may be due to glass transition of the drugs in tablet powder, an endothermic peak at 66.88°C which may be due to the melting of RAM, and a very weak and broad exothermic peak at 462.40°C which appears as weak and broad exothermic peak at 516.58°C in the DTA curve of FEL-RAM mixture. The DTA curve also show a very weak endothermic peak at 220.21°C, strong exothermic peak at 338.69°C, and medium exothermic peak at 422.9°C which may be due to interaction of the tablet excipients with FEL and RAM, but not necessarily corresponding to incompatibility. A similar effect was observed for other drug: excipient mixtures, and was attributed to drug dissolution in the melted excipients [31].

Non-isothermal kinetic study

The kinetic studies of the main thermal decomposition steps of RAM and FEL were investigated using the mathematical models (1 and 2) of Horowitz-Metzger and Coats-Redfern, respectively [32,33], as shown in FIG. 6-8 . The thermodynamic and kinetic parameters such as activation energy (E), entropy (ΔS), enthalpy (ΔH) and Gibbs free energy (ΔG), as presented in TABLE 1.

analytical-chemistry-coats

FIG 6: Coats-Redfern (A) and Horowitz and Metzger (B) plots of the decomposition of FEL drug.

analytical-chemistry-plots

FIG 7: Coats-Redfern plots of first (A), second (B) and third (C) decomposition steps of RAM drug.

analytical-chemistry-steps

FIG 8: Horowitz and Metzger plots of first (A), second (B) and third (C) decomposition steps of RAM drug.

Horowitz-Metzger method

Horowitz-Metzger equation can be represented as follow:

Where Wf is the mass loss at the end of the decomposition process, W is the mass loss up to temperature T, R was the gas constant, Ts is the DrTGA peak temperature and =T-Ts. A plot of log [log Wf/(Wf -W)] against was gave a straight line and E could be calculated from the slope.

Coats-Redfern method

Coats-Redfern equation can be represented as follow:

Where is the heating rate. While 1-2RT / the plot of the left-hand side of equation (2) against 1/T would give a straight line. E was calculated from the slope and the Arrhenius constant (A) was obtained from the intercept. The enthalpy ΔH, entropy ΔS and free energy ΔG of activation were calculated using the following equations:

•S=2.303 [log (Ah/kT)] R (3)

•H=E*-RT (4)

•G=H*-Ts •S* (5)

Where k and h are the Boltzman and Planck constants, respectively.

TABLE 1 shows thermodynamic parameters of thermal decomposition of FEL and RAM.

Temperature range (°C) E (KJ/mol)
HM (CR)
A (S-1)
HM (CR)
DS (J/mol K)
HM (CR)
DH (KJ/mol)
HM (CR)
DG (KJ/mol)
HM (CR)
FEL
190.62-560 210.674
(195.416)
3.53 × 1018
(1.37 × 1017)
104.642
(77.647)
205.852
(190.590)
145.151
(145.550)
RAM
103.99-137.59 38.931
(32.550)
2.19 × 104
(3.16 × 102)
-164.164
(-199.40)
35.656
(29.272)
100.332
(107.830)
137.59-350.37 128.454
(116.444)
4.61 × 1010
(4.42 × 109)
-46.48
(-65.984)
123.526
(111.514)
151.073
(150.620)
350.37-590.23 230.919
(225.976)
1.25 × 1014
(2.71 × 1014)
16.573
(23.025)
224.133
(219.185)
210.604
(200.390)

TABLE 1. Thermodynamic parameters of thermal decomposition of FEL and RAM.

FIG. 6-8 show the Coats-Redfern and Horowitz and Metzger plots of the decomposition of FEL and RAM drugs.

The DSC investigation of FEL and RAM

FIG. 9 shows the DSC curves of FEL, RAM and FEL-RAM mixture, FIG. 9A (DSC curve of FEL) exhibits an endothermic peak at 141.55°C (melting of FEL) and exothermic peak at 308.47°C which appear at 143.61°C and at 310.69°C in the DTA curve of FEL. FIG. 9B (DSC curve of RAM) displays an endothermic peak at 108.08°C (melting of RAM), extremely weak exothermic peaks at 210.11°C and 333.17°C which appear at 112.18°C, 215.98°C and at 336.28°C the DTA curve of RAM.

analytical-chemistry-curves

FIG 9: DSC curves of FEL (A), RAM (B) and FEL-RAM mixture (C) at heating rate of 5°C/min.

FIG. 9C (DSC curve of FEL-RAM mixture) shows an endothermic peak at 99.30°C which may be attributed to melting of RAM, and two consecutive weak exothermic peaks at 311.52°C and 348.75°C which appear at 104.62°C, 316.45°C and at 351.97°C the DTA curve of FEL-RAM mixture.

Van’t Hoff equation: Tf =T0-[(R T02 X/ΔHf). 1/F] [34] is used to calculate the purity value of drugs, where Tf is the melting temperature of the sample, T0 is the melting point of pure substance in Kelvin (K), R is the gas constant, ΔHf is the heat of fusion, F is fraction of sample melted at Tf, and x is mole fraction of impurities in the sample.

Application of thermal analysis to quality control of FEL and RAM

In this work, thermal analysis of FEL and RAM (TGA, DrTGA, DTA and DSC) was used as an alternative technique for laboratory-screen tests (long-term tests) for the determination of different quality parameters such as, melting point, purity, ash content and water content. TABLE 2 shows the melting point values of FEL and RAM in the DTA and DSC curves, using melting point apparatus and official method [35]. The purity values of FEL and RAM were founded to be 99.88% and 99.92%, respectively. TABLE 3 shows the purity values of FEL and RAM using DSC method and official methods [1]. No significant difference was observed between the obtained results when compared with those of the official methods [1,35]. From the results, we conclude that thermal analysis can be used as quality control tool to determine melting point, purity, water content and ash content of both drugs. There is no interaction between FEL and RAM based on DTA and DSC results. Furthermore, thermal fingerprint of FEL and RAM provided information on identification, crystal perfection, dehydration and thermal degradation.

Drug Melting point (°C)
DTA method Melting point* apparatus DSC Method Official method [35]
FEL 143.61 144.2 141.55 145
RAM 112.18 110.7 108.08 109

TABLE 2. Melting points of FEL and RAM.

Parameters Thermal analysis Official method [1]
FEL RAM FEL RAM
Loss on drying* 0.22% 0.026% 0.25%
(N.M.T 0.5%)
0.015%
(N.M.T 0.2%)
Ash content* Zero% Zero% 0.03%
(N.M.T 0.1%)
0.02%
(N.M.T 0.1%)
Purity DSC Official method [1]
FEL RAM FEL RAM
99.88%  99.92% 98.90% 99.76%

TABLE 3. Quality control parameters obtained from the thermal analysis of FEL and RAM compared with the official method.

Conclusion

In this work green method was studied for thermal analysis of FEL and RAM using different thermal techniques. This method was applied in binary mixture and co-formulated tablet. The melting point values obtained by DTA and DSC confirm the precision of these techniques when compared with the official methods. Therefore these techniques can be used for identification of both drugs based on their melting points. The purity values, water content and ash content of RAM and FEL are in agreement with that obtained by the official methods. Thus, the method was applied for the quality control of both drugs.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the National Organization for Drug Control and Research (NODCAR, Egypt) for providing instruments and the means necessary to complete this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

izmir escort izmir escort bursa escort antalya escort izmir escort porno porno izle türk porno eskişehir escort bartın escort burdur escort izmir escort bursa escort porno indir izle escort izmir