Original Article, Volume: 13( 5)
Heavy Metals in Common Edible Vegetables of Industrial Area in Kushtia, Bangladesh: A Health Risk Study
- Islam R, Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Islamic University, Kushtia-7003, Bangladesh, Tel: +88-071-74910-20; E-mail: [email protected]
Received: August 26, 2017; Accepted: September 18, 2017; Published: September 20, 2017
Citation: Islam R, Kumar S, Karmoker J, et al. Heavy Metals in Common Edible Vegetables of Industrial Area in Kushtia, Bangladesh: A Health Risk Study. Environ Sci Ind J. 2017;13(5):150
This study investigated heavy metals concentration in vegetables collected from the suburban area of Kushtia district in Bangladesh as well as their detrimental effects on public health via dietary intake. Concentration of five heavy metals (As, Mn, Zn, Cd and Pb) in the eight vegetables were measured using AAS. Heavy metals concentration for experimented vegetables were found to be higher than the safe limits suggested by FAO/WHO, except As for brinjal, Zn for green papaya and cauliflower, and Pb for tomato, bean and spinach. The values of the estimated daily intake (EDI), target hazard quotients (THQ), hazard index (HI), and carcinogenic risks (CRs) were measured to evaluate the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risks. The values of EDI for tested metals were found below the maximum tolerable daily intake (MTDI). In addition, the individual values of THQs and their total (TTHQ) with exception of As, were greater than unity, that indicated the potential non-carcinogenic health risk to the consumers. Furthermore, HI>1 which may possess potential health risks. However, calculated values of the total CRs (TCRs) of As (7.40E-03) and Pb (1.05E-04) were higher than the USEPA standards. These results of tested vegetables picked out the possible lifelong carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risks to consumers due to intake of under the current consumption rate.
Common edible vegetables; Heavy metals contamination; Estimated daily intake (EDI); Health risk assessment
Heavy or dense metals are of great concern as they are non biodegradeable and persistent for a lifetime in the human body through dietary intake or other exposure sources [1-3]. Interacting this pipeline, vegetables are the important food of daily diet because they are the good source of Vitamin A and C, iron, calcium, folic acid and fiber . These food products are easily contaminated with heavy metals due to natural activities (weathering and volcanic eruptions), and anthropogenic activities (rapid industrialisation, vehicular exhaust, wastewater irrigation, sludge applications in agricultural area etc.) [5-7]. A few heavy metals such as Cd, Pb, As have been identified as the most toxic elements in the atmosphere as well as in soil and water. In the list of priority pollutants of US Environment Protection Agency (USEPA), heavy metals such as Cd, Pb and As have been placed [8-9]. Environment Protection Agency has placed Cd and Pb in group B2 indicated Cd and Pb being possible human carcinogens . IARC has classified Cd compounds as carcinogenic to human (Group 1) and inorganic Pb compounds (Group 2A) as probably carcinogenic to human. Similarly, Pb has been classified as possibly carcinogenic to human (Group 2B) and As has been placed in group A by USEPA . Hence, it is undoubtedly noticed that the contamination of vegetables by heavy metals should be determined with great priority based on the assessment of health risks. In contrast, it is obvious that the degree of accumulation of heavy metals depends on the soil type, plant species, growth condition of the plant, presence of other ions in the soil .
A regular monitoring survey has been performed in various part of the world to measure the heavy metals concentration in the edible parts of the vegetables [4,6,13-15]. In order to determine the extent of environmental contamination by heavy metals, the degree of human exposure and potential health risks via vegetable consumption, a several number of studies has been carried out in Bangladesh [16-17]. However, in Kushtia district, no studies have been done to evaluate the non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risk of heavy metals through vegetable consumption.
The area of Kushtia district in Bangladesh is suffering from great pollution with congestion, rapid expansion in urban area for rapid industrialization and a number of anthropogenic activities. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the contamination status and health risk of toxic heavy metals such as As, Pb, Cd, Mn, and Zn in eight different edible vegetable species at Kushtia industrial area of Bangladesh.
Materials and Methods
The common edible vegetables: Carrot (Daucus carota), potato (Solanum tuberosum), brinjal (Solanum melongena), tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum), bean (Lablab purpureus), green papaya (Carica papaya), cauliflower (Brassica oleraceae var botrytis) and spinach (Spinacea oleracea) were collected in April 2015 from the industrial area of Kushtia district, the western part of Bangladesh under Khulna division (Figure 1).
It is located at 23.90 latitudes and 89.12 longitudes and is situated at elevation 17 m above sea level, with an area of 1608.80 square kilometers. The district is bordered by Rajshahi, Natore, Pabna districts to the north, by Chuadanga and Jhenaidah districts to the south, by Rajbari district to the east, Meherpur district to the west, and an international boundary to the West Bengal of India to the west. The main rivers: Ganges (Padma), Gorai, Mathabhanga, Kaliganga and Kumar are flowing through the district. The temperature ranges between 37.8°C to 9.2°C and an annual rainfall average is 1,467 millimeters.
Sampling and pretreatment of samples
The vegetable samples were randomly collected from agricultural fields near the industrial area of Kushtia district each of three times in a year. Only the consumable parts of the sample were selected and washed primarily with tap water, and then deionized water so as to remove any soil and dirt particles. Then the samples were partially dried in air and cut down into small pieces with a knife of stainless steel. The small pieces of samples separately were dried in an electric oven at 80°C for 48 h time period to get a constant dry weight. Then dried samples each of three were taken into a mortar and pestle made of ceramic to grind them. The powdered samples were passed through 2 mm mesh of nylon wire, and then kept in zipped polyethylene bag at room temperature for digestion.
Digestion of the previously treated samples
The powdered samples (each of 1 g) were treated with a mixture of three acids such as nitric acid (HNO3), sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and perchloric acid (HClO4) in the volume ratio of 5:1:1 and controlled temperature at 80°C for three hours up to the samples solution became transparent. After cooling at room temperature, the samples were filtered with Whatman cellulose filter papers and diluted to 50 ml with deionized water .
Heavy metals analysis by AAS
Atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS Varian SpectrAA-220) fitted with a specific hollow cathode lamp of particular metal and direct flame (air-acetylene) was used to determine the heavy metals (As, Mn, Zn, Cd and Pb). The wavelengths were 279.5 nm for Mn, 283.3 nm for Pb, 228.8 nm for Cd, and 213.9 nm for Zn. Arsenic was analyzed with hydride vapor generation (HVG) method using argon as a carrier gas at wavelength 193.7 nm . Blanks and calibration with standard solutions were also analysed by the same method. The results were expressed as mg/Kg body weight/day.
Analysis of the samples and measurement of quality control were followed by the steps. Analytical grade chemical reagents were used, various metal stock solutions were prepared from high purity compound (99.9%) purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Freshly prepared double deionized distilled water used to avoid contamination which was produced by three steps procedure as, distillation, deionization, and ultra-purification.
Estimated daily intake (EDI) of heavy metals: The estimated daily intakes (EDI) of heavy metals due to ingestion of vegetables were estimated using the following equation:
CM: Concentration of heavy metal in vegetable samples (mg Kg-1 fresh weight);
FIR: Vegetables ingestion rate (0.17004 Kg person-1 day-1) ;
BW: Average body weight (60 Kg person-1) taken from the ‘‘Report of the household income and expenditure survey 2010’’ [16,20].
Non-carcinogenic risks assessment: To estimate non-carcinogenic risks, the target hazard quotient (THQ) and total target hazard quotient (TTHQ) were calculated as per Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Region III’s risk-based concentration table by using the following equation :
In order to assess the overall potential for non-carcinogenic health effects from more than one heavy metal, a hazard index (HI) formulated based on the guidelines for health risk assessment of chemical mixtures as follows :
TTHQ: Total THQ from individual vegetable item;
THQ: Target hazard quotient (dimensionless);
EFr: Exposure frequency (365 days Year-1);
ED: Exposure duration (70 years);
CM: Concentration of heavy metal in vegetable (mg Kg-1 fresh weight);
FIR: Vegetables ingestion rate (170.04 Kg Person-1 Day-1) ;
BW: Average body weight (60 Kg Person-1) drawing from the ‘‘Report of the household income and expenditure survey 2010”;
AT: Average exposure time for noncarcinogenic effects (ED × 365 days Year-1);
RfDo: Oral reference dose (mg Kg-1 Day-1).
The RfDos were 0.0003, 0.14, 0.3, 0.003 and 0.0035 mg Kg-1 Day-1 for AS, Mn, Zn, Cd, and Pb respectively . It is presumed that all arsenic ions are inorganic to determine the appropriate RfDo for THQ. When the value of THQ is less than unity, the exposed population is unlikely to experience certain harmful effects. If THQ is greater than unity there is a potential non-carcinogenic health risk and suitable remedies and defensive measurements are required to be taken.
Carcinogenic risks of As and Pb: Carcinogenic risk (CR) is the possibility of an individual lifetime health risk from carcinogens by selected heavy metals. The carcinogenic risk (CR) factor (lifetime cancer risk) of As and Pb can be calculated as :
AT: Average exposure time for noncarcinogenic effects (ED × 365 days Year-1);
SF: Oral slope factor (mgKg-1 Day-1)-1;
Oral slope factor from the Integrated Risk Information System USEPA database was 1.5 and 8.5 × 10-3 (mg/kg/d)-1 for As and Pb .
The total carcinogenic risk (TCR) of individual heavy metal of all vegetables can be calculated from the following equation:
Data were statistically analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine the significant differences of metal concentrations among eight vegetables. The significance was set at 95% confidence level.
Results and Discussion
Heavy metals concentrations in vegetables
Mean concentrations and standard deviations of five heavy metals: As, Cd, Pb, Mn and Zn in eight different vegetables from Kushtia district in Bangladesh are listed in Table 1. Considerable variations in the concentration of As, Cd, Pb, Mn and Zn were observed from the same sampling location. This may be due to the variations in their morphology and physiology for heavy metal ingestion, accumulation, ejection, and retention . It was observed that the ranking order of mean concentrations of the heavy metals in the vegetables were As<Cd<Pb<Mn<Zn. The arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), manganese (Mn) and zinc (Zn) in the vegetable samples were in the range of 0.10 to 0.43, 0.13 to 0.55, 0.33 to 0.80, 2.01 to 6.49 and 16.83 to 49.89 mg/Kg-body weight/day respectively.
|Vegetables||Scientific name||Heavy metals (mg/Kg body wt./day)a|
|Carrot||Daucus carota||0.18 ± 0.01a||2.12 ± 0.31e||39.58 ± 3.01c||0.36 ± 0.05a||0.80 ± 0.09a|
|Potato||Solanum tuberosum||0.14 ± 0.01a||2.01 ± 0.30e||42.98 ± 3.33b||0.55 ± 0.07a||0.61 ± 0.06a|
|Brinjal||Solanum melongena||0.10 ± 0.00a||3.92 ± 0.43cd||26.03 ± 2.78f||0.48 ± 0.05a||0.57 ± 0.05a|
|Tomato||Lycopersicon lycopersicum||0.13 ± 0.02a||4.61 ± 0.52bc||49.89 ± 4.37a||0.27 ± 0.03a||0.42 ± 0.03a|
|Bean||Lablab purpureus||0.23 ± 0.02a||2.71 ± 0.39e||26.66 ± 2.79f||0.24 ± 0.03a||0.48 ± 0.05a|
|Green papaya||Carica papaya||0.37 ± 0.03a||3.99 ± 0.42cd||17.39 ± 1.57h||0.13 ± 0.01a||0.56 ± 0.04a|
|Cauliflower||Brassica oleracea var botrytis||0.16 ± 0.01a||3.47 ± 0.37d||16.83 ± 1.46h||0.34 ± 0.05a||0.59 ± 0.04a|
|Spinach||Spinacea oleracea||0.43 ± 0.04a||6.49 ± 0.61a||33.92 ± 3.11d||0.42 ± 0.04a||0.33 ± 0.03a|
|*Mean ± SD for all vegetables||0.22 ± 0.02a||3.67 ± 0.42d||31.66 ± 2.80e||0.35 ± 0.04a||0.54 ± 0.05a|
a Values within the same column with different letters are significantly different (P<0.05)
†BDL= Below Detection Limit of AAS; As (BDL: 0.0005 mg/L); Mn (BDL: 0.009 mg/L)
Zn (BDL: 0.005 mg/L); Cd (BDL: 0.002 mg/L); Pb (BDL: 0.002 mg/L)
*(Mean ± SD) (mg Kg-1 fresh weight)
**Permissible limit in mg Kg-1 fresh weight
Table 1: Overview the concentration of heavy metals in the vegetables collected from agricultural fields in Kushtia industrial area of Bangladesh.
Arsenic (As): Arsenic is widespread in the environment because of both natural and anthropogenic processes. It is a ubiquitous, but potentially toxic trace element. Generally Arsenic and its compounds come in soil through ground water, by-product of metal smelting, burning fossil fuels, agricultural chemicals, and glass materials, pharmaceuticals, and metallic alloys. Since our tested vegetables were collected from Kushtia industrial area, Arsenic (As) may contaminate through ground water, soil eroded water by Padma river via Ganga-Kapotakkho (GK) water route for irrigation project or by industrial effluents which may pose a potential threat [23,24]. According to FAO/WHO , arsenic concentration in vegetables should not exceed 0.10 mg/Kg. The highest concentration of As was found at 0.43 mg/Kg in spinach whereas the lowest at 0.10 mg/Kg in brinjal. In the present study, arsenic concentrations in the selected vegetables were slightly higher than the permissible limit of FAO/WHO  except brinjal (Table 1). Statistically, all the samples did not show significance difference (P>0.05). Previous studies reported that concentration of As was 0.07 to 3.9 mg/Kg in vegetable of Jamalpur and Chandpur districts  and 0.04 to 1.9 mg/Kg in vegetables of Comilla, Rajshahi and Sathkhira districts in Bangladesh . Arsenic concentration of vegetables was found at 0.009 to 7.9 mg/Kg in Patuakhali  and 0.01 to 0.2 mg/Kg in Noakhali . The concentration of As in vegetables collected from different areas of Bangladesh ranged from 0.005 to 0.5 mg/Kg .
Manganese (Mn): Manganese is a low toxicity element which has considerable biological significance. No maximum is identified for manganese in vegetables. Statistically, there was a significance (P<0.05) different in Mn concentration among all selected vegetables. Spinach exhibited the maximum Mn concentration of 6.49 mg/Kg and potato showed the minimum of 2.01 mg/Kg. Normally, vegetables contain Mn concentration ranging from 6.93 to 28.35 mg/Kg [29,30]. In the current study, Mn concentration determined in all the selected vegetables were below the literature values.
Zinc (Zn): Zinc is a major essential element required in human physiological system. It is highly harmful to humans when its concentration level exceeds tolerable limits. According to FAO/WHO, the maximum permitted concentration for Zn was 20 mg/Kg body weight/day. A research reported that chronic exposure to Zn and/or Cu is associated with Parkinson’s disease . Vegetables are known to possess a high threshold level of Zn. There were significant (P<0.05) differences in Zn concentration among all the studied vegetables. The highest amount of Zn was observed in tomato (49.89 mg/Kg) and the lowest was in cauliflower (16.83 mg/Kg) among the eight-vegetable species (Table 1). From the literature survey, Zn concentration in different vegetables of Bangladesh ranged from 5.0 to 5.3 mg/Kg , 1.9 to 4.8 mg/Kg , and 19.54 to 42.06 mg/Kg . In our study, among all the eight vegetable samples, only cauliflower and green papaya were below the permissible level of Zn recommended by FAO/WHO (Table 1).
Cadmium (Cd): Cadmium is an element capable of producing chronic toxicity present at minimum concentration of 1 mg/Kg . According to FAO/WHO, Cd concentration in vegetables should not exceed 0.05 mg/Kg. In this study, the highest amount of Cd was observed in potato (0.55 mg/Kg) and the lowest amount in papaya (0.13 mg/Kg). Statistically, all selected vegetables did not show significance difference (P>0.05). A research  found the concentration of Cd (0.01 to 0.22 mg/Kg) in Jessore district of Bangladesh. In previous studies, the concentration of Cd in different vegetables was found at 0.03 mg/Kg , 0.1 mg/Kg , 0.06 mg/Kg . In the present study, the concentration of Cd for all selected vegetables was significantly (P<0.05) higher than the literature. This may be due to the long-term discharge of untreated industrial wastes, fertilizers which could pollute the vegetables.
Lead (Pb): Lead is a well-known and non-essential element that can cause nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and many others adverse health effects . Lead contents in gasoline by car exhausts mixed with soil near roads, metal smelting, battery manufacturing, painting on the outside of buildings and other factories that use lead. This lead gets into the air and then mixes with the soil. The agricultural soils in Kushtia District, Bangladesh contain higher amount of lead (Pb) which may cause the lead availability in vegetables [36,37]. From the literature, the concentration of Pb ranges from 0.005 to 0.057 mg/Kg , 0.03 to 6.3 mg/Kg  and 0.7 to 17 mg/Kg . In accordance with FAO/WHO, Pb concentration in vegetables should not exceed 0.50 mg/Kg as fresh weight basis. Statistically, there was not significance (P>0.05) different in Pb concentration among all selected vegetables. The highest concentration of Pb was found in carrot (0.80 mg/Kg) and the lowest was in spinach (0.33 mg/Kg). The present study showed that the Pb concentration of all selected vegetables was higher than the maximum allowable limit of FAO/WHO (Table 1) except tomato, bean, and spinach .
Estimated daily intake (EDI) of heavy metals
Heavy metals transport from plants to human through oral, dermal, and nasal . As a basis for estimating a population diet in terms of daily intake levels of nutrients, bio-active compounds and contaminants, the dietary exposure of vegetables is used. This provides vital information for the potential nutritional deficiencies or exposure to food contaminants . The EDI of heavy metals were calculated according to the average concentration of each heavy metal in each vegetable species, and the corresponding consumption rate . Table 2 showed the overview of EDI for five heavy metals in vegetables. The mean values of total EDI of heavy metals in the selected vegetables were found 4.97E-03 mg/Kg for As, 8.32E-02 mg/Kg for Mn, 7.19E-01 mg/Kg for Zn, 7.91E-03 mg/Kg for Cd and 1.24E-02 mg/Kg for Pb. These were lower than the maximum tolerable daily intake (MTDI). The raking order of EDI values was observed Zn>Mn>Pb>As>Cd (Table 2).
|Vegetables||EDI of heavy metals (mg/Kg body wt./day)a|
|Carrot||5.11E-04 ± 2.84E-04||6.02E-03 ± 8.80E-04||1.12E-01 ± 8.55E-03||1.02E-03 ± 1.42E-05||2.27E-03 ± 2.56E-04|
|Potato||3.98E-04 ± 2.84E-05||5.71E-03 ± 8.52E-04||1.22E-01 ± 9.46E-03||1.56E-03 ± 1.99E-04||1.73E-03 ± 1.70E-04|
|Brinjal||2.84E-04 ± 0.00||1.11E-02 ± 1.22E-03||7.39E-02 ± 7.90E-03||1.36E-03 ± 1.42E-04||1.62E-03 ± 1.42E-04|
|Tomato||3.69E-04 ± 5.68E-05||1.31E-02 ± 1.48E-03||1.42E-01 ± 1.24E-02||7.67E-04 ± 8.52E-05||1.19E-03 ± 8.52E-05|
|Bean||6.53E-04 ± 5.68E-05||7.70E-03 ± 1.11E-03||7.57E-02 ± 7.92E-03||6.82E-04 ± 8.52E-03||1.36E-03 ± 1.42E-04|
|Green Papaya||1.05E-03 ± 8.52E-05||1.13E-02 ± 1.19E-03||4.94E-02 ± 4.46E-03||3.69E-04 ± 2.84E-05||1.59E-03 ± 1.14E-04|
|Cauliflower||4.54E-04 ± 2.84E-05||9.85E-03 ± 1.05E-03||4.78E-02 ± 4.15E-03||9.66E-04 ± 1.42E-04||1.68E-03 ± 1.14E-04|
|Spinach||1.22E-03 ± 1.14E-04||1.84E-02 ± 1.73E-03||9.63E-02 ± 8.83E-03||1.19E-03 ± 1.14E-04||9.37E-04 ± 8.52E-05|
|EDI of vegetables||4.97E-03||8.32E-02||7.19E-01||7.91E-03||1.24E-02|
|bMTDI||1.30E-01||2.00E00 to 5.00E||6.00E+01||2.10E-02||2.10E-01|
aEach value in the table represnts the mean ± SD of three measurements
bMTDI, maximum tolerable daily intake 
Table 2: Estimated daily intake (EDI) of heavy metals from consumption of the vegetable species collected from Kushtia district of Bangladesh.
Non-carcinogenic health risks assessment
The target hazard quotient (THQ) is used to determine the non-carcinogenic health risk levels due to pollutant exposure. When the value of THQ is higher than unity, there is a probability of non-carcinogenic health risks . THQ values of five tested heavy metals in the selected vegetables are shown in Table 3. The values of THQ for all the heavy metals with exception of Mn were higher than unity, indicating the uptake of a single metal through vegetable consumption may cause significant potential health risks. The increasing order of total THQ (TTHQ) of vegetables were found brinjal<tomato<cauliflower<potato<bean<carrot<papaya<spinach. The summation of TTHQ of individual heavy metal termed as hazard index (HI). When the value of HI exceeded unity, it may pose health hazards .
|Vegetables||THQ values of heavy metals*||†TTHQ|
|Carrot||1.70E-00 ± 9.45E-02||4.29E-02 ± 6.28E-03||3.74E-01 ± 2.84E-02||3.40E-01 ± 4.72E-02||6.48E-01 ± 7.29E-02||3.10|
|Potato||1.32E-00 ± 9.45E-02||4.07E-02 ± 6.07E-03||4.06E-01 ± 3.15E-02||5.20E-01 ± 6.61E-02||4.94E-01 ± 4.86E-02||2.78|
|Brinjal||9.45E-01 ± 0.00||7.94E-02 ± 8.70E-03||2.46E-01 ± 2.63E-02||4.53E-01 ± 4.72E-02||4.62E-01 ± 4.05E-02||2.19|
|Tomato||1.23E-00 ± 1.89E-01||9.33E-02 ± 1.05E-02||4.71E-01 ± 4.13E-02||2.55E-01 ± 2.83E-02||3.40E-01 ± 2.43E-02||2.39|
|Bean||2.17E-00 ± 1.89E-01||5.49E-02 ± 7.89E-03||2.52E-01 ± 2.64E-02||2.27E-01 ± 2.83E-02||3.89E-01 ± 4.05E-02||3.09|
|Green Papaya||3.50E-00 ± 2.83E-01||8.08E-02 ± 8.50E-03||1.64E-01 ± 1.48E-02||1.23E-01 ± 9.45E-03||4.53E-01 ± 3.24E-02||4.32|
|Cauliflower||1.51E-00 ± 9.45E-02||7.02E-02 ± 7.49E-03||1.56E-01 ± 1.38E-02||3.12E-01 ± 4.72E-02||4.78E-01 ± 3.24E-02||2.53|
|Spinach||4.06E-00 ± 3.78E-01||1.31E-01 ± 1.23E-02||3.20E-01 ± 2.94E-02||3.97E-01 ± 3.78E-02||2.67E-01 ± 2.43E-02||5.18|
*Each value in the table represnts the mean ± SD of three measurements.
**TotalTHQ of individual metal
†Total THQ of individual vegetable
††Sum of TTHQ=Hazard Index (HI); if TTHQ or HI<1 means Non-carcinogenic risks
Table 3: Overview of non-carcinogenic risks (THQ and TTHQ) of heavy metals from consumption of the vegetable species collected from Kushtia district of Bangladesh.
In the present study, the value of HI (25.58) was higher than unity. Figure 2 showed the percentage of THQ of heavy metals for the selected vegetable ingestion. The highest percentage of THQ in the selected vegetables was As (61.21%), followed by Pb (12.55%), Cd (12.25%), Zn (11.06%) and Mn (2.93%).
Carcinogenic health risks assessment
Heavy metal concentrations especially As and Pb in Environment without anthropogenic influences are usually low and do not pose risks to humans or ecosystems. It would be more detrimental when it crosses its tolerable limits. In recent decades, anthropogenic activities like-agricultural, industrial, and mining have contributed to significant increases in the amount of these contaminants in the environment [43,44].
The carcinogenic risk (CRs) evaluated from the uptake of As and Pb in selected vegetables were calculated as these two metals may create both non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks depending on the exposure dose. CRs values of As and Pb in the selected vegetables are shown in Table 4. CRs values of As ranged from 4.25E-04 in brinjal to 1.83E-03 in spinach. However, CRs values of Pb ranged from 7.95E-06 in spinach to 1.93E-05 in carrot. The values of CRs exceeded the acceptable limit 10-6  indicating lifetime cancer risk to the subjected population consuming both metals through the vegetables. On the other hand, the TCRs values are lower than 10-6 which is considered to be negligible. Value more than 10-4 is considered as unacceptable , and values between 10-6 and 10-4 are generally considered as acceptable range . In this study, the values of total carcinogenic risks (TCRs) of As and Pb were found as 7.40E-03 and 1.05E-04 respectively (Table 4). Therefore, based on the results of the present study, the potential health risk to the targeted population due to metal exposure via vegetables consumption should not be ignored.
|Vegetables||CRs values of heavy metalsa|
|Carrot||7.65E-04 ± 4.25E-05||1.93E-05 ± 2.17E-06|
|Potato||5.95E-04 ± 4.25E-05||1.47E-05 ± 1.45E-06|
|Brinjal||4.25E-04 ± 0.00||1.37E-05 ± 1.21E-06|
|Tomato||5.53E-04 ± 8.50E-05||1.04E-05 ± 7.23E-07|
|Bean||9.78E-04 ± 8.50E-05||1.16E-05 ± 1.21E-06|
|Green papaya||1.57E-03 ± 1.28E-04||1.35E-05 ± 9.64E-07|
|Cauliflower||6.80E-04 ± 4.25E-05||1.42E-05 ± 9.64E-07|
|Spinach||1.83E-03 ± 1.70E-04||7.95E-06 ± 7.23E-07|
aEach value in the table represnts the mean ± SD of three measurements
bTotal Carcinogenic risk (Mean values)
CRs acceptable limit is 10-6 and TCRs acceptable limit is 10-4 
Table 4: Overview of carcinogenic risks (CRs) of As and Pb tested vegetables.
The present study illustrated that vegetables of Kushtia industrial area of Bangladesh accumulated As, Mn, Zn, Cd and Pb at high concentrations compared to maximum permissible limits. Five heavy metals were found to be considered as potential health hazards for consumers. The EDI values of tested metals in the selected vegetables were found below the MTDI level. The values of THQ and HI showed that the consumers have a warrant of non-carcinogenic health risk due to the vegetables contaminated with heavy metals. The high values of CRs as well as TCRs indicated that the consumers of these vegetables consisting of As and Pb might have lifelong carcinogenic health risks. Therefore, consumption of the vegetables in this area may create health risk in the long run. In this context, based on potential risks to ecosystems and human health, anthropic activities for the contamination of heavy metals should be reduced significantly that’s would be the best way of remediation.
- Zhou H, Yang WT, Zhou X, et al. Accumulation of heavy metals in vegetable species planted in contaminated soils and the health risk assessment. Int JEnv Res Pub Health. 2016;13(3):289.
- Qian Y. Heavy metal-regulated gene expression. In: Ramos K, editor. Comprehensive toxicology, vol. 2, Celluar and Molecular Toxicology. Amsterdam; Elsevier, Netherlands; 2009.
- Islam MS, Ahmed MK, Al-mamun MH, et al. Trace metals in soil and vegetables and associated health risk assessment. Environ Monit Assess. 2014;186(12):8727-39.
- VK Garg, Poonam Y, Suman M, Et al. Heavy metals bioconcentration from soil to vegetables and assessment of health risk caused by their ingestion. Biol TraceElem Res. 2014;157(3):256-65.
- He ZL, Yang XE, Stoffella PJ. Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2005;19(2-3):125-40.
- Cherfi A, Abdoun S, Gaci O. Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in Algeria. Food Chem Toxicol. 2014;70:48-53.
- Verma P, Agrawal M, Sagar R. Assessment of potential health risks due to heavy metals through vegetable consumption in a tropical area irrigated by treated wastewater. Environ Syst Decis. 2015;35(3):375-88.
- Cameron RE. Guide to site and soil description for hazardous waste site characterization. Volume 1: metal. Environmental Protection Agency EPA/600/4-91/029. Washington, DC: USEPA. 1992.
- Lei M, Zhang Y, Khan S, et al. Pollution, fractionation, and mobility of Pb, Cd, Cu, and Zn in garden and paddy soils from a Pb/Zn mining area. Environ Monit Assess. 2010;168(1-4):215-22.
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Risk assessment guidance for superfund, vol. I: Human health evaluation manual (part F, supplemental guidance for inhalation risk assessment).EPA-540-R-070-002. 2009.
- US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA); Risk assessment guidance for superfund. Human health evaluation manual part A, Interim Final, vol. I.EPA/540/1-89/002. Washington, DC, 1989.
- Islam MS, Ahmed MK, Al-Mamun MH. Metal speciation in soil and health risk due to vegetables consumption in Bangladesh Environ Monit Assess. 2015;187(5):288.
- Hu J, Wu F, Wu S, et al. Bioaccessibility, dietary exposure and human risk assessment of heavy metals from market vegetables in Hong Kong revealed with an in vitro gastrointestinal model. Chemos. 2013;91(4):455-61.
- Khillare PS, Jyethi DS, Sarkar S. Health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals via dietary intake of vegetables grown in the vicinity of thermal power plants. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50(5):1642-52.
- Yang QW, Xu Y, Liu SJ, et al. Concentration and potential health risk of heavy metals in market vegetables in Chongqing, China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2011;74(6):1664-9.
- Islam MS, Ahmed MK, Al-Mamun MH, et al. Preliminary assessment of heavy metal contamination in surface sediments from a river in Bangladesh. Environ Earth Sci. 2014;73(4):1837-48.
- Sarkar T, Alam MM, Parvin N, et al. Assessment of heavy metals contamination and human health risk in shrimp collected from different farms and rivers at Khulna-Satkhira region, Bangladesh. Toxicol Reports. 2016;3:346-50.
- Allen SE, Grimshaw HM, Rowland AP. Chemical Analysis. In: Moore PD, Chapman SB, editors. Methods in Plant Ecology. Oxford: Black well Scientific Publication, London, UK; 1986; p:285-344.
- American Public Health Association (APHA) Standards Method for the Examination of Water and Waste Water. 22th ed. 2012.
- Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES). Preliminary Report on Household Income and Expenditure Survey-2010. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistics Division, Ministry of Planning, Dhaka, Bangladesh. 2011.
- US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA); Risk-Based Concentration Table. 2010. http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/index.htm
- US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA); Risk Based Screening Table. Composite Table: Summary Tab 0615. 2015. Accessible at. http:/www2.epa.gov/risk/risk based screening table generic tables.
- MM Karim. Arsenic in groundwater and health problems in Bangladesh. Water Res. 2000;34(1):304-10.
- Mahmood S, Ali MM, Baten MA, et al. Assessment of Arsenic (As) contamination in soils of Kushtia and Rangpur districts. Int J Biosci. 2016;8(5):219-28.
- Food and Agricultural Organization/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO); Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods, Food CF/5 INF/1. Fifth Session. The Hague, the Netherlands. 2011.
- Das HK, Mitra AK, Sengupta PK, et al. Arsenic concentrations in rice, vegetables, and fish in Bangladesh: A preliminary study. Environ Int. 2004;30(3):383-7.
- Williams PN, Islam MR, AdomakoEE, et al. Increase in rice grain arsenic for regions of Bangladesh irrigating paddies with elevated arsenic in ground waters. Envr Sci and Tech. 2006;40(16):4903-08.
- Rahman MM, Asaduzzaman M, Naidu R. Consumption of As and other elements from vegetables and drinking water from an As-contaminated area of Bangladesh. J Hazard Mat. 2013;262:1056-63.
- Shaheen N, Irfan NM, Khan IN, et al. Presence of heavy metals in fruits and vegetables: Health risk implications in Bangladesh. Chemos. 2016;152:431-8.
- Gorell J, Johnson C, Rybicki B, et al. Occupational exposures to metals as risk factors for Parkinson's disease. Neurol. 1997;48(3):650-8.
- Roychowdhury T, Tokunaga H, Ando M. Survey of arsenic and other heavy metals in food composites and drinking water and estimation of dietary intake by the villagers from an arsenic-affected area of West Bengal, India. Sci Total Environ. 2003;308(1):15-35.
- Tripathi RM, Raghunath R, Krishnamoorthy TM. Dietary intake of heavy metals in Bombay city, India. Sci Total Environ. 1997;208(3)149-59.
- Ahmad JU, Goni MA. Heavy metal contamination in water, soil, and vegetables of the industrial areas in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Environ Monit Assess. 2010;166(1-4):347-57.
- Alam MGM, Snow T, Tanaka A. Arsenic and heavy metal contamination of vegetables grown in Samata village, Bangladesh. Sci Total Environ. 2003;308(1-3):83-96.
- Khan SI, Ahmed AKM, Yunus M, et al. Arsenic and cadmium in food chain in Bangladesh: An Exploratory study. J Health Popul Nutr. 2010;28(6):578-84.
- Saha N, Rahman MS, Jolly YN, et al. Spatial distribution and contamination assessment of six heavy metals in soils and their transfer into mature tobacco plants in Kushtia District, Bangladesh. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23(4):3414-26.
- Hossain AMMM, Islam MS, Mamun MM, et al. Environmental surveillance of commonly-grown vegetables for investigating potential lead and chromium contamination intensification in Bangladesh. Springer Plus. 2016;5(1):1803.
- Agency for Toxic Substances, Disease Registry (ATSDR); Toxicological, TP-92/02. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Atlanta. 2000.
- World Health Organization (WHO); Guidelines for the study of dietary intakes of chemical contaminants. WHO Offset Publ. 1985(87): 1-102.
- Santos EE, Lauri DC, Silveira PCL. Assessment of daily intake of trace elements due to consumption of food stuffs by adult inhabitants of Rio de Janeiro city. Sci Total Environ. 2004;327(1-3):69-79.
- Wang X, Sato T, Xing B, et al. Health risks of heavy metals to the general public in Tianjin, China via consumption of vegetables and fish. Sci Total Environ. 2005;350(1-3):28-37.
- Zhuang P, Murray BM, Hanping X, et al. Health risk from heavy metals via consumption of food crops in the vicinity of Dabaoshan mine, South China. Sci Total Environ. 2004;407(5):1551-61.
- Lu Z, Cai M, Wang J, et al. Baseline values for metals in soils on Fieldes Peninsula, King George Island, Antarctica: The extent of anthropogenic pollution. Environ Monit Assess. 2012;184(11):7013-21.
- Paye HS, Mello JWV, Abrahão WAP, et al. Quality reference values ??for heavy metals in soils in the State of Espírito Santo. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2010;34(6):2041-51.
- Fryer M, Collins CD, Ferrier H, et al. Human exposure modeling for chemical risk assessment: A review of current approaches and research and policy implications. Envr Sci Pollut. 2006;9(3)261-74.