All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Current opinion

, Volume: 14( 1) DOI: 10.37532/ 2320-1967.2022. 14(1).158

The yield of monomeric sugar from several grasses grown in Thailand as biofuel feedstock was evaluated using a two-stage

Takash CuiUniversity of South Carolina, China.,Phone No: +86 5698455185 ,,Email:

Received date: February 15, 2022, Manuscript No. tscx-22-79997; Editor assigned: February 18, 2022, PreQC No. tscx-22-79997 (PC); Reviewed: February 21, 2022, QC No. tscx-22-79997 (Q); Revised: February 24, 2022, Manuscript No. tscx-22-79997(R); Published date: February 30, 2022, DOI: 10.37532/ 2320-1967.2022. 14(1).158

Citation: Takash Cui. The Yield of Monomeric Sugar from Several Grasses Grown in Thailand as Biofuel Feedstock was Evaluated Using a Two-Stage. ChemXpress. 2022;14(1):158.




Because of broad customary utilization and irrelevant secondary effects, Curcuma longa L. (Zingiberaceae family) and its polyphenolic part curcumin have been exposed to the scope of the antimicrobial examination. Curcumin and C. longa rhizome extricate has been displayed to show antimicrobial movement against various microscopic organisms, infections, growths, and parasites. Curcumin's potential antibacterial activity made it a decent choice for synergistically upgrading the inhibitory impact of existing antimicrobial medications. For sure, different examinations have been directed to work on curcumin's antimicrobial viability, including the development of different substance mixtures to build its water dissolvability and cell take-up. This study endeavours to depict existing curcumin antimicrobial examinations in anticipation of its utilization as a characteristic antibacterial in later investigations.


Napier grass; Liignocellulose ethanol creation; GHG outpourings


Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum), Tiger grass (Thysanolaena maxima), Mission grass (Pennisetum polystachyon), Kans grass (Saccharum spontaneum) and Monster reed (Arundo donax) were secretly accumulated to test as bioethanol feedstock. All grasses, showing high cellulose and hemicellulose pieces, were treated by a two-stage microwave/compound pretreatment strategy. The ideal conditions of the pretreatment were investigated and the most limit monomeric sugar yields were dissected. The microwave-assisted NaOH and H2SO4 with 15:1 liquid to solid extent were concentrated by fluctuating impulse obsession, temperature, and time to increase the proportion of the procured monomeric sugar. The best monomeric sugars conveyed from microwave-helped NaOH pretreatment were 5.57 g (at 600 C/10 min, 0.5%(w/v) NaOH for Napier grass), 6.45 g (at 1400 C/15 min, 1%(w/v) NaOH for Tiger grass), 6.56 g (at 1200 C/10 min, 3% (w/v) NaOH for Mission grass), 6.78 g (at 800 C/5 min, 5% (w/v) NaOH for Kans grass), and 6.84 g (at 1200 C/5 min, 5% (w/v) NaOH for Monster reed) per 100 g biomass, while most limit monomeric sugars from microwaveassisted H2SO4 pretreatment were 42.03 g (at 1600 C/15 min, 1% (w/v) H2 SO4 for Napier grass), 30.37 g (at 2000 C/5 min, 0.5% (w/v) H2SO4 for Tiger grass), 34.34 g (at 2000 C/5 min, 1%(w/v) H2SO4 for Mission grass), 33.76 g (at 2000 C/10 min, 0.5% (w/v) H2SO4 for Kans grass), and 31.91 g (at 1800 C/30 min, 0.5% (w/v) H2SO4 for Monster reed) per 100 g biomass.

Advanced measures, for instance, lignocellulosic ethanol creation, have the potential for diminished life cycle GHG outpourings when differentiated and standard grain-based ethanol, and as a matter of fact fossil-based stimulates. Sensibility assessment gadgets and energy assessment have been used to assist with recognizing influences along deftly and taking care of chains and abatement influence. This has helped target significant and furthermore beneficial overhauls and improvements, giving critical legitimacy approaches. Key switches have emerged particularly in the usage of yield and cycle developments, the assurance of advances, and the smoothing out of cycles.

While there are both natural and thermochemical courses to lignocellulosic ethanol, the normal flow has seen indisputably more examination and through and through more business effort. Likewise, biomass-decided hydrocarbon powers ('drop-ins'), but their higher energy densities and full closeness with existing establishment ensure their continued with charm and study, have been outflanked such a long way by lignocellulosic ethanol. In this way, its GHG execution is particularly analyzed. Focus in on GHG releases decline is headed somewhat by various methodology frameworks. By strengthening resource and taking care of viability redesigns and engaging circularisation of resource use that supresses demand, reducing GHG outpourings can further develop money related earnestness as well.

The relative environmental impact of lignocellulosic ethanol differentiated and conventional fills or possibly grain ethanol is routinely studied through life cycle assessment (LCA). LCA's ability to quantify resource and cycle improvements has added to its pervasiveness as a huge gadget in the evaluation of bioenergy systems; the amount of such examinations has radically extended in the latest 10 years. These evaluate a grouping of feedstocks and a more set number of creation developments. GHG transmissions related with lignocellulosic ethanol creation can go between − 1.1 kg CO2 eq/km branched out to 0.28 kg CO2 eq/km for E10, − 1.15 Kg CO2 eq/km to 0.79 kg CO2 eq/km for E85, and − 1.25 Kg CO2 eq/km to 0.84 kg CO2 eq/km for E100, conversely, with 0.26 Kg CO2 eq/km from customary gas.

The vast majority of bioethanol creation to date has been moved in the US and Brazil, with Brazil conveying more than 30% of overall ethanol, for the most part consumed locally to replace 40%-45% fuel. Brazil's sugarcane-resolved ethanol is astoundingly successful, with crop yields some place in the scope of 80 and 85 t/ha and more than 90% mechanical sugar recovery; it is monetarily and vivaciously high performing, overall with a correspondingly low natural impact stood out from conventional gas and other bioethanol developments [3]. It addresses some away from of GHG decline driven headway at scale and gives a concise gander at the potential for lignocellulosic powers in consolidated biorefineries to further develop ethanol yield and decrease GHG radiations

While this part revolves around GHG transmissions, the greater furthest reaches of viability assessment wrap various components; they may be especially changed or require decisions about splits the difference. GHG outpourings decline and biodiversity insurance, for example, are affected by fundamental elements: kinds of yield created, land brought into creation, land the leaders practices got, and ecological organizations impacted, interalia. Mixed meadow grasses are generally lower-yielding than energy grasses, but with a higher biodiversity record; whether or not to use a higher-yielding harvest to impact the tiniest possible zone or to use a lower-yielding structure giving higher neighborhood biodiversity and domain, yet over a greater locale, to achieve a comparative proportion of fuel will reliably require a setting unequivocal assessment.


Through life cycle assessment, the relative biological impact of lignocellulosic ethanol separated from conventional fuels or maybe grain ethanol is continuously evaluated (LCA). LCA's ability to quantify resource and cycle improvements has added to its omnipresence as a critical gadget in the evaluation of bioenergy systems; the amount of such examinations has definitely extended in the latest ten years. These survey a collection of feedstocks and a more set number of creation developments. This part summarizes a piece of the LCA composing on the production of ethanol from dialect cellulose, including key zones where assessing the GHG influences has or may incite creation and cycle viability redesigns, cutting down GHG releases and supporting technique goals. We furthermore address a couple of hardships related with assessment and contact on future viewpoints.

Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 256

ChemXpress received 256 citations as per Google Scholar report

Indexed In

  • CASS
  • Google Scholar
  • Open J Gate
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • Cosmos IF
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • Secret Search Engine Labs
  • Scholar Article Impact Factor (SAJI))

View More